Barriers to humanitarian volunteerism in middle income countries
This topic was posted the General discussion forum area and has 8 replies.
You can also post a reply by emailing post77@forums.alnap.org. See our forum guidelines for more details.
Medical Officer/ Research Support Coordinator, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
1 July 2010, 02:44
|
Earlier this year, the National University of Malaysia (UKM) with the cooperation of MERCY Malaysia (a humanitarian NGO) has been working to establish a working framework to allow its health personnel working in the university hospital to safely volunteer with MERCY Malaysia's humanitarian work abroad whilst maintaining the appropriate liability cover and security. What we have found in our initial analysis several significant barriers to volunteerism in what can be defined as a principally middle-income country. I just wonder if others in similar circumstances can share their experiences here in this forum. |
Professor, and Convenor GlobalHealth@UNSW, University of New South Wales
1 July 2010, 10:26
|
I would be interested to learn more... We are doing some work on human resources for health and public health emergencies (PHEs - conflict, natural disasters, epidemics, environmental change, etc...) as part of an initiative around Knowledge Synthesis in relation to Human Resources for Health. One focus is how health and humanitarian workers are impacted by the PHEs in which they work, another is to look at how they can support community and system resilience and response more effectively. See: http://www.hrhhub.unsw.edu.au/HRHweb.nsf/page/Public+Health+Emergencies Related to this project are a series of Stories and Strategies (see links to page above) which we are working on with a range of people - these explore issues related to human resources in public health emergency contexts. It would be good to see how your experiences relate to others that we are seeking to document. |
(Topic starter)
Medical Officer/ Research Support Coordinator, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
1 July 2010, 11:03
|
I was intrigued by Aitken et al's paper (2009) regarding support provisions for Australian DMAT members; and our work was based much on his findings. Thank you for your input; I had a cursory look of the linked website today - will relay this to the rest of team. Shall be in touch directly through email soon. |
Consultant, Consultant
1 July 2010, 15:49
|
"What we have found in our initial analysis several significant barriers to volunteerism in what can be defined as a principally middle-income country." Could you say more what these barriers are? Is it that the university hospital doesn't have a way to allow these employees to deploy and have coverage for their work at the hospital? That there are no resources for training? Is it lack of resources to transport and accommodate the volunteers? Is it that the volunteers can't afford to give up their pay while they are volunteering in the field? |
(Topic starter)
Medical Officer/ Research Support Coordinator, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
2 July 2010, 09:38
|
Your questions have merit, however I could not answer them in an open forum such as this. Employment regulations in the public sector are quite strict, and not forgiving enough to effectively encourage volunteerism. Grants and indemnity cover are not easy (or at times, impossible) to obtain. Suffice to say, by conjecture (as I cannot provide any concrete proof), there is still a lot more that needs to addressed. |
Consultant, Consultant
3 July 2010, 03:07
|
"Employment regulations in the public sector are quite strict, and not forgiving enough to effectively encourage volunteerism." Do you mean that the employment regulations would not allow public sector employees to take time off to volunteer with NGOs? Or, do you mean that employment regulations are such that they prevent organizations from involving volunteer (unpaid staff)? "Grants and indemnity cover are not easy" Do you mean grants to cover the resources needed to involve and support volunteers, and clear policies regarding who would be liable for a volunteer's negative actions or a volunteer's injury? "Your questions have merit, however I could not answer them in an open forum such as this." If you would like to write me directly, I'm at jc@coyotecommunications.com Volunteer engagement / volunteer management is my area of expertise, and I would be happy to help you as I can. Even in the USA, many organizations (especially in the private sector) are stuck in the old-paradigm regarding volunteer involvement: that an organization involves volunteers because they are "free", because an organization cannot afford paid staff or does not want to pay staff. That old paradigm approach gets the hackles up of unions, and rightly so -- no paid staff members should ever have his or her job threatened by the involvement of unpaid staff. There *are* ways to appease fears and turn opposition into support. Feel free to write me via email for further discussion if you don't feel like doing it here. |
Benfield University College London Hazard Research Centre
5 July 2010, 10:00
|
This discussion is throwing light on a very important issue. It is also opening up a wider debate about the role of citizen engagement, participation, solidarity and social capital in the humanitarian endeavour. We need a lot of thinking (and re-thinking) about new or alternative ways of working. The sociological literature on 'emergent groups' in disasters might be a starting point for this. |
Professor, and Convenor GlobalHealth@UNSW, University of New South Wales
5 July 2010, 11:10
|
Interesting observations. John can you say more about these issues? In particular the issue of emergent groups and their role(s)? Can you refer to some key papers? In response to other issues your raise - what debate is there about citizen engagement, participation and solidarity in humanitarian endeavours? How is this manifest? is there indeed an interest in greater levels of engagement - as distant places suffering adversity are brought into our living rooms through new technologies and an ability to facilitate the stories of those affected being told? On a separate issue, might there be risks of much broader participation without recognition of the gains made in promoting standards and accountability? For example, widespread donation and transport of medicines, equipment, and indeed people to disaster zones may help little, and worse, may impede needed activity and tie up government personnel in trying to manage the influx. What ethical guidelines and principles underlie the engagement of donor agencies, professionals, citizens, NGOs and others in these settings? |
(Topic starter)
Medical Officer/ Research Support Coordinator, UKM Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, MALAYSIA
5 July 2010, 11:53
|
I am not familiar with the term emergent groups in disasters. John, perhaps you can elaborate. I agree with Anthony in terms of the possible unexpected negative outcome of broader participation lacking in standards. In the social context of a country that is speeding up its change to achieve "developed status", her citizens are more aware of global humanitarian issues and are willing to participate. However, the context of this participation is not fully grounded on the what is actually happening at the austere zones. |
Share and bookmark