Translate with Google Translate

Ensuring quality of evidence generated through participatory evaluation in humanitarian contexts

Method note #3 (ALNAP Discussion Series: Improving the quality of EHA evidence)


About this resource

Resource type:Factsheets and summaries
Keywords:Accountability and Participation, Evaluation-related, Participation
Author(s):Alexander, J. and Bonino, F.
Date published:November 2014

Participatory evaluations are becoming ever more commonplace as a means of engaging with affected communities. As agencies move towards prioritising the input and feedback of those they hope to assist, these methods start featuring more prominently in how programmes are evaluated. 

Nevertheless, questions often arise about the quality and credibility of evaluative evidence, such as whether evidence gathered using this type of evaluation approach is accurate and credible. This short EHA method note resumes the discussion in the ALNAP Humanitarian Evaluation (EHA) Community of Practice (CoP) around benefits of participatory evaluations, methods and approaches, and offers insights from CoP members around these questions.

Related resources

Addressing causation in humanitarian evaluation: A discussion on designs, approaches and examples

Method note #4 (ALNAP Discussion Series: Improving the quality of EHA evidence)

Tools, guidelines and methodologies

Strengthening the quality of evidence in humanitarian evaluations

Method note summary (ALNAP Discussion Series: Improving the quality of EHA evidence)

Factsheets and summaries


Before you download this file, please answer two questions to help us monitor usage

1) What do you think you'll use this document for?

  • Other:

1) What is your email address?

2) What is the name of your organisation?

Please answer both questions above Submit

Starting your download...

Pilot version: You are downloading the pilot version of this guide; we welcome any feedback you have. Please email

Close this overlay