Translate with Google Translate

Addressing causation in humanitarian evaluation: A discussion on designs, approaches and examples

Method note #4 (ALNAP Discussion Series: Improving the quality of EHA evidence)


About this resource

Resource type:Tools, guidelines and methodologies
Author(s):Alexander, J. and Bonino, F.
Date published:January 2015

Programme managers, donors, decision makers at all levels want to answer the question – did our intervention lead to the desired impact? What difference did our intervention make?

Understanding cause-and-effect, or causation, is what distinguishes evaluations from other processes such as assessment and monitoring. However not all evaluations address, or are expected to answer questions about cause-and-effect. Many observers have noted that most evaluative work focuses on process issues, describing what happened during an intervention and how, rather than answering the question of whether the intervention brought about the intended results. Over the last decade, humanitarians have increasingly tried to tackle the harder and more complex question of causality.

This note explores this issue, offers methods used and examples of establishing causality in evaluation of humanitarian action (EHA) work.


Before you download this file, please answer two questions to help us monitor usage

1) What do you think you'll use this document for?

  • Other:

1) What is your email address?

2) What is the name of your organisation?

Please answer both questions above Submit

Starting your download...

Pilot version: You are downloading the pilot version of this guide; we welcome any feedback you have. Please email

Close this overlay