Evaluation quality reviews
Since 2001, ALNAP has attempted to monitor the quality of evaluation reports of humanitarian action through its annual meta-evaluation, which is published as part of ALNAP’s Review of Humanitarian Action series.
The meta-evaluation is carried out by two consultants, who independently rate a set of evaluation reports against the ALNAP Quality Pro Forma. The Quality Pro Forma is ALNAP’s evaluation-assessment tool, based on recognised evaluation standards and desirable qualities unique to evaluation of humanitarian action.
The final reports of ALNAP’s meta-evaluations are:
Meta-evaluation: Joint evaluations coming of age? The quality and future scope of joint evaluations
7th Review of Humanitarian Action
Author: Tony Beck and Margie Buchanan-Smith
Publication date: 2008
Meta-evaluation
Review of Humanitarian Action in 2004
Author: Peter Wiles
Publication date: 2005
Meta-evaluation
Review of Humanitarian Action in 2003
Author: Tony Beck
Publication date: 2004
Meta-evaluation
Annual Review 2003
Author: Tony Beck
Publication date: 2003
Meta-evaluation
Annual Review 2002
Author: Tony Beck
Publication date: 2002
Evaluations of Humanitarian Aid in Response to the 1999 Kosovo Crisis: Synthesis and Meta-evaluation
Annual Review 2001
Author: Raymond Apthorpe
Publication date: 2001
Share and bookmark