It’s all about meE: Using structure experiential learning (“e”) to crawl the design space

Back to results
Author(s)
Pritchett, L., Samji, S. and Hammer, J.
Pages
46pp
Date published
01 Dec 2012
Type
Research, reports and studies
Keywords
Assessment & Analysis, Evaluation-related, Monitoring

There is an inherent tension between implementing organizations—which have specific objectives and narrow missions and mandates—and executive organizations—which provide resources to multiple implementing organizations. Ministries of finance/planning/budgeting allocate across ministries and projects/programmes within ministries, development organizations allocate across sectors (and countries), foundations or philanthropies allocate across programmes/grantees. Implementing organizations typically try to do the best they can with the funds they have and attract more resources, while executive organizations have to decide what and who to fund. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) has always been an element of the accountability of implementing organizations to their funders. There has been a recent trend towards much greater rigor in evaluations to isolate causal impacts of projects and programmes and more ‘evidence base’ approaches to accountability and budget allocations.